Himanshu Kumar on Indefinite fast at Jantar Mantar on Adivasi issues
01 Jun 2013 1 Comment
in Advocacy, Announcements, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law, Violence against Women Tags: Facebook, Government, Iran Pro League, Life, Marriage, Mining, Saranda Forest, Sreesanth
Anti-Vedanta campaign gathers steam
29 May 2013 12 Comments
in Advocacy, Announcements, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law Tags: Dongria Kondh, Kalahandi district, Kondha, Mining, Niyamgiri, Rayagada, Supreme Court, Vedanta

KORAPUT: With the Supreme Court leaving it to villagers to decide the fate of Vedanta‘s mining plan at Niyamgiri hills at gram sabhas, the anti-mining campaign at villages situated in and around Niyamgiri hills has gained momentum.
Hundreds of tribals, including Dongria Kondhs, assembled at Rayagada‘s Parsali village on Sunday and vowed not to allow an inch of Niyamgiri for bauxite mining.
“Niyamgiri is a source of livelihood for thousands of tribals of around 120 villages of Rayagada and Kalahandi districts. Once mining starts, the tribals will lose their livelihood and scores of perennial sources of water will dry up. We will fight tooth and nail against mining at Niyamgiri,” said sarpanch of Parsali Butu Khora.
According to the apex court’s April 18 order, the gram sabhas will also examine the cultural and religious claims of Dongria Kondhs over the hills.
The tribals, who had assembled under the banner CPI (ML), also decided to organize similar anti-mining meetings at all panchayats, which will be affected by the mining, and urge villagers to participate in large number at gram sabhas to oppose mining at Niyamgiri hills
Related articles
- Anti-Vedanta cry gets shriller- Tribals made aware of ill- effects of Mining (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Anti-Vedanta body to march near Niyamgiri (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Vedanta HQ in London mobbed by Protesters, as SC gives Gramsabha Powers to decide (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Odisha to seek six more weeks to conduct Niyamgiri Gram Sabhas (kractivist.wordpress.com)
Press Release – PESA and bauxite mining in Andhra Pradesh- HRF
04 Apr 2013 3 Comments
in Advocacy, Announcements, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law, Minority Rights, Press Release Tags: APMDC, Bauxite, Forest produce, Gram panchayat, Human Rights, Krishna, Mining, Visakhapatnam
April 4, 2013
The Human Rights Forum (HRF) takes strong objection to the reported view of the AP Mineral Development Corporation (APMDC) that it does not have to hold gram sabhas in the area where it is leasing in land for bauxite mining because the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas Act) 1996 (PESA) is not applicable to major minerals.
If the APMDC thinks it is being very clever, we invite its officers to read PESA once again. Section 4 (k) and 4 (l) which refer to prior recommendation of the gram sabha or the panchayats for grant of prospecting or mining lease is confined to minor minerals, but those are not the only provisions of PESA. Under Section 4 (d), the power to safeguard and preserve the community resources, which is another name for common property resources, should be with the gram sabha.
Though the land being leased to APMDC for mining bauxite in the Visakhapatnam agency is forest land, undertaking mining in that land will affect the water resources of the neighbouring hamlets since the water retained in the bauxite hills is the source of the rivulets and subsoil water that the people depend upon. It is a well-established fact that the hills containing bauxite deposits have a good capacity for retention of water, which will be lost for ever if the hills are opened up for mining.
The land proposed to be mined is also a source of minor forest produce such as thatching and dry twigs. It is a source of grazing for animals. The ownership of such minor forest produce is conferred on the gram sabha by Section 4 (m) (ii) of PESA and tat right cannot be unilaterally taken away.
We demand that the APMDC stop acting over-intelligent and follows scrupulously the provisions of Section 4 (d), 4 (m) (ii) and the general principle in section 4 (m) that the gram panchayat in the Scheduled Areas is endowed with the power of self-government. PESA is a progressive legislation that protects the adivasi communities’ rights to land and resources in tribal areas. These rights simply cannot be overridden unlawfully.
VS Krishna
(HRF State general secretary)
Related articles
- Gujarat- Illegal mining in Tapi district causing havoc to environment (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- State in a fix over bauxite mining leases (thehindu.com)
- Forest land cannot be diverted for #Vedanta project, says India #goodnews (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Inside report from the Supreme Court Niyamgiri case against #Vedanta #mustread #mustshare (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- #India- Apex court puts a ‘God’ poser for Vedanta Group (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Jairam Ramesh for 20-yr mining freeze in AP tribal areas #goodnews (kractivist.wordpress.com)
Almost 42,000 hectares of forest land diverted in Odisha
27 Mar 2013 1 Comment
in Advocacy, Announcements, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law Tags: Forest, Forest Rights Act, Kondha, Mining, Ministry of Environment and Forests (India), National Aluminium Company, Odisha, The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006
,Jayajit Dash | Bhubaneswar March 26, 2013 BS
Land diversion for mining, irrigation, power, roads, railways, industries & defence
Forest land diversion has been carried out in the state in accordance with Section 2 of Forest Conservation Act, forest minister Bijayshree Routray said in a written reply in the state assembly.
On compliance to Forest Rights Act and the August 2009 notification of the Union ministry of environment & forest, he said, “The proposals submitted to the MoEF are processed in accordance with the guidelines dated August 3, 2009 issued by the ministry in the matter of compliance of Scheduled Tribes & Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act-2006.
Certificate on five terms complying to the provisions of the above circular of MoEF is submitted by the collectors of the concerned districts who head the district level committee for settlement of Forest Rights and are annexed to the forest diversion proposal while recommending the diversion proposal to the ministry. The certificates along with the resolution of the gram sabha duly signed by the members present and its English version are sent to MoEF for consideration.”
The state government is sitting over 431 proposals of forest land diversion across sectors like irrigation, industry, mining, energy, railway, roads & bridges and human habitations.
Mining sector tops the list with 205 proposals pending for diversion of forest land.
Other sectors with forest land diversion proposals in the pipeline are irrigation (27), industry (29), energy (44), railway (21), roads & bridges (37), human habitations (2) and miscellaneous (66).
It may be noted that mining activity alone has resulted in diversion of 8,194.86 hectares (or 20,249.94 acres) of forest land in Keonjhar district.
Related articles
- Forest land cannot be diverted for #Vedanta project, says India #goodnews (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- #India- Environment ministry denies forest clearance to Vedanta #goodnews (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Violation of law in land allotted to tribal people, claims study on Forest Rights Act (kractivist.wordpress.com)
Columbia halts mining multinationals in indigenous territory #goodnews
16 Feb 2013 Leave a comment
in Advocacy, Announcements, Health Care, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law Tags: Colombia, Colombian, El Tiempo, Gold mining, Indigenous People, Indigenous rights, Mining, Monday
A judge suspended Monday all activities by mining companies in nearly 50,000 hectares of indigenous lands in northwest Colombia, reported local media.
In an “unprecedented” ruling, all mining and exploration activities in 49,421 acres of territories belonging to indigenous Embera Katio communities have been halted for up to six months due to a failure to consult and protect the communities, according to El Tiempo.
“[This decision] only seeks to prevent the continued violation of the rights of indigenous peoples on their territory [arising from] disproportionate use by people outside the community, and the violence that has been occurring in the area, of which there is much evidence, ” said the judge.
The injunction covers an area known as the Alta Andagueda in Choco and Antioquia departments. The companies affected include multinational gold miner AngloGold Ashanti, working in the area with Continental Gold, and Colombian company Exploraciones Choco Colombia.
The judge ordered a halt to activities in 80 percent of the collective territory of the Embera Katio in order to protect the communities, noting that an increase in mining concessions in the area since 2006 has been mirrored by an increase in violence. The area has already seen several indigenous communities displaced to nearby cities due to violence.
BACKGROUND: Colombia to relocate 148 displaced indigenous families
While indigenous communities have a constitutional right to be consulted on the use of their land, the judge did not declare the mining concessions illegal but ordered the suspension to protect indigenous communities while the legality of the titles is determined. Some of the licenses held by the mining companies for the area reportedly do not expire until 2038 and 2041.
The decision to suspend mining for the sake of indigenous communities comes in the same week as a decision to suspend an eco-tourism project in Tayrona National Park for the same reason

Related articles
- Indigenous Struggles 2012: Dispatches from the Fourth World (climate-connections.org)
- Fighting to the Death (intercontinentalcry.org)
- [People] FULL FORCE for SMI-XSTRATA Mines by Judy A. Pasimio (hronlineph.com)
- #India- Tribal Affairs Minister Deo opposes bauxite mining in Vizag agency area (kractivist.wordpress.com)
Effects of Supreme Court’s judgement on #Vedanta group companies
07 Dec 2012 7 Comments
in Advocacy, Health Care, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law, Minority Rights Tags: Goa, Mining, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Niyamgiri, Orissa, Sterlite Industries, Supreme Court, Vedanta
6 DEC, 2012, 04.27PM IST, GAURAV MODI,ET BUREAU
The Supreme Court will also come out with a decision tomorrow on the petition filed by the Goa government to resume mining activities. There are three distinct possibilities in this case.
The verdict allows resumption of mining activities- SC’s strictness on matters related to environment and illegal mining (as was also seen in the Karnataka mining ban) makes this scenario least possible. However, it may so happen that the court allows partial mining as the sector contributes nearly 35% to the GDP of the state and provides huge employment. In this case, analysts believe that the fair value of the stock should be in the range of Rs 190-200.
The verdict only allows transportation of already mined inventory- it is believed that this looks like the most plausible case and will help Sesa Goa release roughly 2.5 million tonnes of iron ore it has in inventory. This case will however not be a big boost to the company as it is believed that the fair value in this case is Rs 165-Rs170.
The verdict uphelds the ban- Since Sesa Goa has 15.5 million tonnes of capacity in Goa out of the total 18.4 million tonnes, this scenario will have a severe impact on the company. The company has not been mining anything since the ban was put. The fair value in this scenario is expected to be around Rs 150-155.
The stock prices of both the group companies have become highly correlated amid the news of potential merger by year end. The prices of both the companies have gone up by 15-20% in the last 10 trading sessions. The conditional nod for the residual stake sale in Hindustan ZincBSE 0.22 % and BALCO by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs last week has also helped the stocks to show a one way run up.
The SC’s decisions today (on Sterlite) and tomorrow (on Sesa Goa) will determine the future changes in the prices of the two companies in the short to medium term
Related articles
- Tribals protest against #Vedanta refinery, demand complete eviction of plant (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- #India- No Mining ,No Vedanta #Indigenous #Tribal #mustwatch (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- #India-SC to seal fate of Vedanta Group’s Lanjigarh refinery on December 3 (kractivist.wordpress.com)
17 Nov 2012 Leave a comment
in Advocacy, Health Care, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law, Minority Rights Tags: BHUBANESWAR, India, Mining, Naveen Patnaik, OMC, Orissa, Shah Commission, United States Bureau of Mines
From being a soporific department under which miners had a free run in the state’s ore-rich hinterland, the Orissa Steel and Mines Department has suddenly changed tack and is showing a fresh burst of energy. The biggest example of this was the Rs 76,000-odd crore penalty levied recently on companies for extracting ore in excess of set limits and violating environmental laws over the past 10 years. Last month, the department also ordered that those waiting for their mining lease to be renewed should restrict production to their captive requirement, and that areas which had not been leased out would be given to state-run Orissa Mining Corporation (OMC). To give an idea of the staggering penalty, consider that it would wipe off Orissa’s Rs 40,000 crore debt, allow the state to have a tax-free budget for the next few years and still leave enough to run several populist schemes. What the Naveen Patnaik government also hopes is that the figure would blind everyone to how the mining mess came to this in the first place. It may not just be a coincidence that the penalty was imposed just days before the M B Shah Commission landed in Orissa for the mining probe. Activists seeking a CBI inquiry say the government has deliberately left loopholes in the penalty order to let the violators go scotfree. For example, they point out, it hasn’t cancelled the lease of miners who violated their lease conditions, which it could have done, and instead levied fines, which it may not have the authority to do under environment laws. Besides, the government is silent on the role played by officials of the Orissa Pollution Control Board, the deputy directors of mines, Indian Bureau of Mines and Forest and Environment Department in the excess mining. The decision to let Orissa Mining Corporation become the default miner may not be a good idea either as the corporation is barely able to run three of its 35 mines, and is itself accused of illegal mining worth over Rs 2,000 crore. Over the past three years, mining has become a major source of revenue for the state, earning it Rs 4,517 crore last year alone. It’s time Orissa treated this asset as an asset. Debabrata is a special correspondent based in Bhubaneswar debabrata.mohanty@expressindia.com
Related articles
- Orissa imposes penalty on ‘errant miners’ (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Leases not renewed but deemed so, mining goes on (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- When excess mining got a legal seal #Odisha (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Tata Steel to make representation to Orissa (kractivist.wordpress.com)
When excess mining got a legal seal #Odisha
12 Nov 2012 2 Comments
in Advocacy, Announcements, Health Care, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law, Minority Rights Tags: IBM, Illegal mining in India, Keonjhar, Mining, Nagpur, Orissa, Orissa High Court, TATA STEEL
pic courtesy, Reuters
Debabrata Mohanty : Bhubaneswar, Mon Nov 12 2012, 01:22 hrs
The IBM, however, says that excess mining is not illegal as long as the companies involved pay the royalty for what they have extracted. In fact, because of an amendment to mining rules, the state and the Centre continue to debate what constitutes illegal mining.
The IBM, with its headquarters in Nagpur, approves the mining plans of each company for a period of five years with predetermined annual limits under section 5(2)(b) of the Mines & Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957 and other rules such as Mineral Concession Rules, 1960, and Mineral Conservation & Development Rules, 1988. A lease period of 20 or 30 years is, therefore, divided into four or six mining plans. After the state government gets the IBM-approved mining plan, it grants or renews a lease.
When the first signs of excess mining in Keonjhar and Sundargarh showed in 2003, IBM officials on the ground spotted it. Official sources said that under the MC&D Rules, 1988, IBM officials are empowered to cancel the lease or impose penalties. It instead revised the mining plan, the sources said.
Documents with the steel and mines department show that in Khandabandh mines in Keonjhar, the IBM had approved extraction of 3.60 lakh tonnes by Tata Steel in 2006-07. The company raised 7.64 lakh tonnes, and again 7.42 lakh tonnes in 2007-08. The next year, the IBM raised the limit to 7.06 lakh tonnes without imposing penalties. In 2002-03, when the limit was 24 lakh tonnes at Joda East mines, the Tatas mined 30.5 lakh tonnes. The next year, the IBM raised the limit to 40.1 lakh tonnes.
“The mining plan/scheme is an instrument to systematically conserve the ores and not finish them overnight. Once a mining plan is given for five years, it should not be revised midway, but that’s what the IBM did,” said Orissa director of mines Deepak Kumar Mohanty. “They didn’t levy any penalty on over-mining and instead set new limits the next year. If you are going to condone illegalities, why have a mining plan/scheme at all?”
IBM officials say excess extraction is not illegal as long as the miner pays the royalty. “Once royalty is paid on excess production of ore, it can’t be called illegal mining. This was more like irregular operations,” said M Biswas, regional controller of mines with the IBM.
Biswas rejected the state’s allegation that the IBM failed to detect irregularities in mining. “We have done our duty and the state government is doing its job,” he said. “The IBM should not be blamed for the wrongs. It has taken action against certain mines by suspending their operations.”
Chief secretary B K Patnaik had written to the Union Mines Ministry about the IBM’s inaction, and the mines secretary wrote back to say that 20 per cent excess mining for a given year is condonable. This July, the ministry amended the MC Rules, 1960, saying mining outside the lease area is illegal but excess mining inside the lease area is not. The state government finds this difficult to accept. “Where is the rule in the MMDR Act that says 20 per cent excess mining can be allowed?” says the state director of mines.
Jayant Das, president of the Orissa High Court Bar Association and a lawyer on mineral matters, said, “The IBM had all the information to be able to crack down on illegal mining. But companies continued to over-extract from mines which had a deemed renewal status. This is not possible without a quid pro quo arrangement.”
Environmental activist Biswajit Mohanty, who has filed a PIL in the Orissa High Court demanding a CBI probe into the scam, said, “If deemed renewal by the state steel and mines department was the main cause of excess mining, the IBM’s negligence or condoning gave the miners the licence to loot.”
Related articles
- Orissa imposes penalty on ‘errant miners’ (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Leases not renewed but deemed so, mining goes on (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Goa Illegal Mining Battle now in Supreme Court (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Mining in rat holes, and a Meghalayan policy (kractivist.wordpress.com)
- Take note of ‘glaring illegalities’ by mining firms, court urged (thehindu.com)
- #Vedanta to restart Odisha refinery from Monday #badnews (kractivist.wordpress.com)
Mining in rat holes, and a Meghalayan policy
12 Nov 2012 1 Comment
in Advocacy, Health Care, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law Tags: Bangladesh, Congress, Constitution, discrimination, Human Rights, India, Indo-Asian News Service, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mining, Nepal, North East, Tribal rights
Photo: Shailendra Pandey
Tehelka Blog, Nov 12, 2012
It is said that Meghalaya has a history of no less the 80 years of unregulated and unscientific mining of natural resources, mostly coal and limestone. Due to customary tribal laws and lack of resistance, unregulated mining has turned into a cottage industry of sorts in the hilly state. In fact, though it remains quite unregulated, mining is Meghalaya’s biggest industry.
For instance, you will come across ‘rat hole mining’ in almost every nook and corner, where minors risk their lives to dig out coal. It was after activists rung the alarm bells on child rights abuse in these ‘rat holes’ that the Meghalaya government started to take the matter seriously. Moreover, the presence of large-scale limestone reserves in the state has made way for dozens of cement manufacturing plants, often set up in violation of environmental and forest guidelines. Meanwhile, the state government has drafted the Meghalaya Mineral Policy 2010 and plans to get it approved in the winter session of the State Legislative Assembly – the last time the Assembly would meet before the state goes to polls in early 2014.
The Mukul Sangma government has already started to hard sell the policy, which promises to bring scientific know-how to miners and private investment to the mining sector so that bigger projects can be envisaged, which would also enable infrastructure development. Sources say, since the Congress in Meghalaya is itself divided in opinion about introducing the policy, the government keeps it on hold. There is a desperate attempt to dress up the policy as a holy cow, but it is really going to be that sacrosanct?
All of Meghalaya falls under the Sixth Schedule areas, where, as per the Constitution, the tribals do not need any prior permission to start mining. So there is no need for environmental, forest or pollution clearances, and the industry is tax-free. Many of the tribals in governance and politics are also seen to be involved in unregulated mining. Though labour laws, child rights and safety norms are joke for Meghalaya’s mining industry, Constitutional safeguards for tribal areas in the form of the Sixth Schedule keep the Centre from poking its nose in the matter. Sources claim that all politicians have huge assets in unregulated mining, and the workers in the sector are either migrant poor from other states, or from Nepal and Bangladesh, or they are trafficked minors. So the state government tends to ignore even major mining accidents.
So the policy might have come about because of the pressure the state government came in from the Guwahati High Court on the issue. The HC had imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on Meghalaya for not having a mining policy, and later another Rs 5 lakh for not regulating mining on tribal land.
Ahead of the election, no political party in Meghalaya would dare to speak against illegal and unregulated mining, and after the poll, everyone will forget the issue and the policy will bite the dust. It is time for the tribal chiefs of Meghalaya, who hold enormous powers, to rise beyond clannish thinking and raise their voice for a regulated mining regime that has respect for the environment, and for forest, labour and child rights.

Related articles
- Meghalaya to mine Odisha coal block, start power project (news.in.msn.com)
- A 11 Bangladeshi immigrants arrested in Meghalaya (indiavision.com)