#India- Report demands full compensation for victims of Kandhamal riots


Special Correspondent, The Hindu

 The report was released by Miloon Kothari, former UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing
A report titled 'Unjust Compensation' prepared by Housing and Land Rights Network highlighting property losses of private individuals during the Kandhamal riots, in Bhubaneswar on Friday.—Photos: Lingaraj Panda
A report titled ‘Unjust Compensation’ prepared by Housing and Land Rights Network highlighting property losses of private individuals during the Kandhamal riots, in Bhubaneswar on Friday.—Photos: Lingaraj Panda

Centre for Sustainable Use of Social and Natural Resources (CSNR), Bhubaneswar, and Housing and Land Rights Network (HLRN), Delhi, on Friday released a report on the compensation paid to the families that had suffered damage and loss of property during the anti-Christian violence in Kandhamal in 2007 and 2008.

The report noted that though the State government provided immediate relief, compensation for ‘damaged houses’ and death, it did not enumerate and provide compensation for the loss of property (other than housing) such as household articles, vital documents (like educational certificates, land records), agricultural equipment, utensils, clothes, agricultural and forest produce, livestock, poultry, and livelihood-related losses.

The government was not having a policy to assess and compensate such losses.

The report was released here by Miloon Kothari, former UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing.

The panel also consisted of Dhirendra Panda, Secretary, CSNR, Shivani Chaudhry, Associate Director, HLRN, and Prafulla Samantara and Nicholas Barla, human rights activists.

The findings of the impact assessment study revealed that the real costs and losses suffered by individuals and families who experienced destruction of their homes and property were immense. While extensive damage to property, both movable and immovable, had been reported, the State has only compensated families for loss of homes.

On the basis of the findings of this study, the report recommended to the State government to take immediate measures to adequately rehabilitate and resettle the victim-survivors of the Kandhamal violence.

The report further urged the government to ensure full reparation to those persons whose livelihoods were affected due to violence and strife.

The government should provide adequate financial assistance to those children whose education was affected because of destruction of books and educational material, unavailability of study material, loss of academic certificates, and inability to attend school during and after the violence, the report suggested.

It further said that the government should provide financial assistance to victim-survivors whose documents of land and property were destroyed and facilitate the process to obtain alternative documents.

The government should develop a new policy for victim-survivors of violence due to conflict, such as in the case of Kandhamal, and implement it immediately, the report said, while urging the government to prepare a long-term strategy to protect and promote secularism and non-casteism in Odisha.

#India- continuous attack on Human Rights Defenders , MASUM activists targetted


 

18 April 2013

 

To

The Chairman

National Human Rights Commission

Faridkot House

Copernicus Marg

New delhi-110001

Respected Sir,

The Declaration on Human Rights Defenders reiterates that States have a prime responsibility to promote, protect, and implement human rights and fundamental freedoms. To this end, State has responsibility to take all necessary measures, including adopting legal guarantees, to ensure that everyone can enjoy these rights in practice, individually and in association with others. In addition to this general obligation to promote and protect human rights; State should take all necessary steps to ensure that the particular rights and freedoms of human rights defenders are effectively guaranteed further and their activities get encouraged. I am referring here an incident where police; an active arm of the state not only violated this well accepted premise of protection of human rights of a defender but infringed fundamental freedom of a human rights defender. This is not an isolated incident, rather the local police- administration- BSF- anti- socials of the area are continuously trying to create hurdles to the activities on protection and promotion of human rights. In this regard I have made complaints to you whenever such attacks were perpetrated on our activists, but till date no visible actions have been taken, which in other hand encouraged the errant. Recently, I had a discussion with the officials over the issue at your office.

 

I want to draw your kind attention regarding the false implication, illegal detention and physical torture committed upon Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh and Mr. Safikul Islam by the police personnel of Raninagar police station, Murshidabad. Both of them are working as a Human Rights Defenders and attached with our organization i.e. Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM) in Murshidabad district for a long time.

 

On the date of the incident they went to Raninagar police station along with Ms. Kanchan Bibi who happens to be a victim of physical torture at her in- laws house and they wanted to lodge a complaint in this regard. But the perpetrator police personnel did not agree to register the complaint. The victims were brutally assaulted by the police personnel of Raninagar Police Station while they requested them to register the complaint. After that the victim Mr. Safikul Islam was falsely implicated, illegally detained and brutally tortured in the police station by the perpetrator police personnel while they came to know that the victim is a Human Rights Defender and attached with our organization.

 

Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh lodged a written complaint before the District Magistrate, Murshidabad and the Superintendent of Police, Murshidabad informing the whole incident of brutal torture and humiliation committed upon him in the hands of the perpetrator police personnel of Raninagar Police Station; he also stated on that application regarding the matter of illegal detention, false implication and brutal torture committed upon Mr. Safikul Islam by the police personnel of Raninagar Police Station. But till date no action has been taken by the higher authorities.

 

It is important here to mention that it is not the solitary incident that the human rights activists like Mr. Safikul Islam who is attached with our organization has been implicated in a false and concocted criminal case by the police in the district. Recently Mr. Gopen Chandra Sharma who is a noted human right activist and attached with our organization was also implicated in false criminal cases initiated by police. It is to be noted that our organization with active participation and work of the human rights activists attached with our organization brought numerous incidents of human rights violations cases in the district-Murshidabad to the notice of the Commission and the Commission intervened into those cases.

 

It is clear that the human rights activists attached with our organization are under attack in the hands of the police as police and the administration want to throttle the voice of the victims of torture and on human rights violations which are raised through the human rights activists. The higher authorities of police and administration know such conspiracy of police against the human rights activists working in the district as several complaints have been lodged before them informing them on the incidents of attack upon the human rights activists by the police but they are sitting silent on the matter.

 

Hence we seek your urgent intervention regarding the following matters: –

·       The whole investigation should be investigated by the Commission’s own investigating agency.

·       The concerned authorities in the district-Murshidabad must be directed to immediately stop harassment and attack upon the human rights activists working in the district and give them proper protection.

·       Mr. Safikul Islam should be released from all false charges immediately and the perpetrator police personnel of Raninagar police station must be booked under the law immediately for their unlawful acts and must be prosecuted under the criminal law.

·       The victims must be given adequate compensation and protection,so that they do not come under threat or inducement.

Thanking You

Yours truly

 

 

Kirity Roy

Secretary, MASUM

&

National Convener, PACTI

 

 

Name of the victims: – 1) Mr. Safikul Islam, son of- Mr. Majibur Raheman, by faith- Muslim, residing at Village- Char- Shibnagar, Police Station- Raninagar, District- Murshidabad, West Bengal. 2) Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh, son of- Mr. Panjatan Seikh, by faith- Muslim residing at Village- Khedurpara, Post Office- Harudanga, Police Station- Raninagar, District- Murshidabad, West Bengal.

 

Name of the perpetrators: – 1) Mr. Swarup Biswas (Sub-Inspector of Raninagar Police Station), 2) Mr. Ajay Paul (Sub-Inspector of Raninagar Police Station), 3) Mr. Anil Biswas (Sub-Inspector of Raninagar Police Station) 4) Mr. Abdul Kalam (Home Guard of Raninagar Police Station) of Raninagar Police Station, Murshidabad, West Bengal.

 

Date and time of incident: – On 28.03.2013 at about 6 pm.

 

Place of occurrence: – Inside Raninagar Police Station under Domkal Sub-Division, District- Murshidabad, West Bengal.

 

Case details: –

 

It is revealed during fact finding that Ms. Kanchan Bibi, the sister of the victim named Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh, spent her married life for two years and from the very beginning of her marriage her husband and other members of her in law’s house started to demand money from her paternal house. This situation became more serious when they did not get money from her paternal house and they started to torture her for that reasons.

 

On 25.03.2013 at 2.30 pm Mrs. Kanchan Bibi, was brutally assaulted by her husband namely Mr. Sentu Seikh, Ms. Sabiya Bewa (mother-in-law of Ms. Kanchan Bibi), Mr. Akkassh Seikh (brother-in-law of Mrs. Kanchan Bibi), Mrs. Beauty Bibi (sister-in-law of Ms. Kanchan Bibi) and Mr. Jamrul Seikh (son of Mr. Akkash Seikh and Ms. Beauty Bibi). They forcibly hit Mrs. Kanchan Bibi with some heavy weapon on her head. They wanted to try to kill her when they realized that they would not get money from her paternal house. She shouted after receiving brutal torture by them and she had to lay down on the floor with severe pain. The neighbors of Ms. Kanchan Bibi rashly came to her in law’s house to rescue her from the hands of the members of her in laws house. After that she was taken to the house of Mr. Jahadi by her neighbors and she got primary medical treatment in his house. After that the neighbors of Ms. Kanchan Bibi informed her father named Mr. Panjatan Seikh about the whole incident committed upon her by the members of her in law’s house and later the victim named Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh took his sister to his house and she was also medically treated in Raninagar Hospital after that.

 

On 28.03.2013 at 4 pm, the victim Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh and Mr. Safikul Islam who known as social activists in the locality went to Raninagar police station along with his sister Ms. Kanchan Bibi to lodge a written complaint regarding the brutal torture committed upon his sister by her husband and other members of her in law’s house. But they waited in the police station for over 2 hours but the police personal showed no mood to lodge a complaint. After that the victims along with Ms. Kanchan Bibi requested Mr. Swarup Biswas, the Sub-Inspector of Police of the said police station, to lodge a complaint after spending 2 hours over there but he started to harass them by saying that they could not lodge a complaint on the basis of that written application as they did not mention proper details to make the application as complaint. After that the victims and Mrs. Kanchan Bibi tried to convince the perpetrator police personal and told that they could show all documents which he wanted to register a complaint. Then the perpetrator police personal ordered the victims to furnish the certificate in connection with the marriage of Ms. Kanchan Bibi. But even after furnishing documents, the perpetrator police personal refused to lodge a complaint. The perpetrator police personal told them to change the complaint as per their demand and if they could to do that then he could lodge complaint on basis of that. After that the victims told the perpetrator police personal that they have sufficient document to lodge a complaint but the perpetrator police personal did not agree with them. The victims after that request the police personal to return the application on which basis they tried to lodge a complaint against the members of Ms. Kanchan Bibi‘s in law’s house. But the perpetrator police personal did not agree to return the complaint to them. Later the victim Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh tried to protest against such illicit behavior of police upon them and told that he did not know the reasons about such harassment upon his sister by the perpetrator police personal after knowing that his sister was going on severe pain due to the brutal torture committed upon her by the members of her in law’s house. The perpetrator police personal started to use abusive words to them and ordered Mr. Abdul Kalam to drive out the victims from the police station. Mean while the victim Mr. Safikul Islam prevented Mr. Abdul Kalam and requested him not to do that to him while the perpetrator police personal caught hold the victim Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh’s neck and drove out from the police station. After that the perpetrator police personnel outburst with anger and started to brutally assault the victims i.e. Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh and Mr. Safikul Islam by saying that they would teach him a proper lesson to them so that they could not able to do work with MASUM (Banglar Manabadikar Suraksha Mancha- A Human Rights Activist Organization) again and also stated that they would teach all of them who have an involvement withMASUM (Banglar Manabadikar Suraksha Mancha- A Human Rights Activist Organization). After that the victims were forcibly driven out by the perpetrator police personnel from the said police station after they got brutal physical torture and humiliation by the perpetrator police personnel. Mean while Mrs. Mamta Begam (informer of police personnel) and Mr. Amzad Husen (informer of police personnel) suddenly came to the said police station while the victims were moving out from the said police station towards their house. They provoked the perpetrator police personnel mentioning Mr. Safikul Islam and told that the victim has connection with every commotions throughout whole Char Area as well as he wanted to spread terror throughout the whole Char Area by using the name ofMASUM (Banglar Manabadikar Suraksha Mancha- A Human Rights Activist Organization) and they also said that the victim has an involvement with those persons who always tried to make conspiracy against the police personnel. The victim always intimated the people at Char Area against the government. Mr. Anil Biswas and other perpetrator police personnel namely Mr. Abdul Kalam and Mr. Ajay Paul rashly run towards the victims after listening to all this from their informers. They caught the victim Mr. Safikul Islam’s shirt from behind. He was brutally assaulted by the perpetrator police personnel of Raninagar police station while the perpetrator police personnel started to forcibly drag him to the same police station and illegally detained him in the same police lock up without giving him any explanation regarding the illegal detention after that. He was illegally detained in the police lock up of Raninagar police station for several hours. After that the perpetrator police personal Mr. Abdul Kalam took the victim to Ghodhonpara Health Centre for medical treatment and the victim got preliminary medical treatment in the said Health Centre by Dr. Tanmay Sarkar. After that the perpetrator police personal Mr. Swarup Biswas willfully influenced Dr. Rama Prasad Majumder (Medical Health officer of Ghodhonpara Health Centre) and requested him not to furnish those type of prescription which proved that the victim was tortured by them and also requested him to admit Mr. Abdul Kalam to his health centre so that they could prove that Mr. Abdul Kalam was brutally tortured in the hands of the victim and they could falsely implicate the victim in a criminal charge.  After that Mr. Abul Kalam lodged a written complaint before the Officer-In-Charge of Raninagar Police Station informing that the victim came to Raninagar police station to lodge a complaint regarding the torture committed upon Ms. Kanchan Bibi and mean while suddenly a controversy was started between the victim and Mr. Abdul Kalam regarding that matter. After that suddenly the victim started to assault him without any reasons. He was seriously injured by the assault. After that a First Information Report was lodged on the basis of that complainy by the perpetrator police personnel and the victim was implicated vide Raninagar Police Station Case No- 212/2013 dated 28.03.2013 under sections 186/353/333/307 of Indian Penal Code. On 29.03.2013, the victim named Mr. Safikul Islam was produced before in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalbagh but the court rejected his bail application.

 

On the same day, another victim named Mr. Mahiruddin Seikh was medically treated by Dr. Nishir Kumar Sarkar. On 01.04.2013, he lodged a written complaint before the District Magistrate, Murshidabad and the Superintendent of Police, Murshidabad informing the whole incident of brutal torture and humiliation committed upon him in the hands of the perpetrator police personnel of Raninagar Police Station as well as he also stated on that application regarding the matter of illegal detention, false implication and brutal torture committed upon Mr. Safikul Islam by the perpetrator police personnel of Raninagar Police Station. But till date no action has been taken by the higher authorities.  On 06.04.2013, the victim Mr. Safikul Islam was produced in the court again and the court released the victim on the basis of allowing his bail application.

Inline images 1

Safikul, HRD attached to MASUM 

Inline images 2

Inline images 3

COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO SP ON 8.4.2013

 

 

Bahrain jails prominent activist Nabeel Rajab for 3 years #WTFnews


 

Published: 16 August, 2012, 13:23
Prominent Bahraini human rights activist Nabeel Rajab attends an anti-regime demonstration in the village of Muqsha, Bahrain, December 9, 2011.

Prominent Bahraini human rights activist Nabeel Rajab attends an anti-regime demonstration in the village of Muqsha, Bahrain, December 9, 2011.

TRENDS:Arab world protests

TAGS: ConflictMiddle EastProtestPolitics,Human rightsOppositionPolice

Bahraini Human rights activist Nabeel Rajab has been sentenced to three years in jail for “participation in an illegal assembly” and “calling for a march without prior notification.”

Rajab has been held in police custody since June 6th, apparently over comments made on twitter critical of the Prime Minister in Bahrain, and calling for him to step down. Rajab was sentenced on July 9th to three months for his remarks, raising eyebrows and concerns around the world among free-speech activists.

But on Thursday, the lower Bahraini court sentenced the human rights activist to another three years for “involvement in illegal practices and inciting gatherings and calling for unauthorised marches through social networking sites”, for his “participation in an illegal assembly” and for his “participation in an illegal gathering and calling for a march without prior notification.”

Rajab himself is a prominent human rights activist, and has played a significant role in anti-regime demonstrations in recent months. Rajab is also affiliated with international groups such as Human Rights Watch.

Human Rights Watch censured the July 9 court ruling and said, “If anyone is guilty of insult today, it is the Bahraini government, which has reminded citizens they’re not free to express political views.” On July 5, Rajab called on the international community to stop the Manama regime’s violent crackdown on protesters in Bahrain.He said the silence of the European community and the United States is a green light for the Al Khalifa forces to continue their violation of human rights in Bahrain.

Amnesty International claimed Bahrain had done little to improve its human rights record following its bloody crackdown on Arab Spring protesters last year.

“Nabeel Rajab’s imprisonment is the latest example of how, despite government promises to introduce reforms following its violent crackdown on protesters in 2011, few improvements have been seen on the ground,” the group said in a statement at the time.

“He should be released immediately and all other charges or convictions against him dropped or overturned,” it added.

Separately, Bahraini lawyers said on August 14 that the appeals court postponed its verdict in the case of 13 detained opposition figures, including senior activist Abdulhadi al-Khawaja, until September 4.

Bahraini protesters have been holding demonstrations against the ruling Al Khalifa family since February 2011 and they hold King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa responsible for the deaths of demonstrators during the uprising.

 

Seema Azad Yearns For Freedom


Human rights activist Seema Azad and her husband are in jail on dubious charges. On 8th February 2010, Seema Azad and her husband were arrested by the Allahabad Special Task Force, under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, for their alleged links with Maoist organizations. The only evidence provided was a book carried by Seema Azad containing information on Maoist politics. From then, they have been detained in custody, and have been refused bail.

Seema Azad is a grassroots journalist and civil liberty activist. She has relentlessly raised her voice against local scams and injustices, denouncing the working condition of mining workers, exposing the practices of the local mafia and its nexus with the police force. She created a bi-monthly magazine — Dastak — as a platform to publicize all the wrongs around her. It is clear to human rights activists that Seema Azad and her husband have been jailed for political reasons. Campaigns have been launched to support her and to put an end to her unfair detention.

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), of which she is an active member, has petitioned the National Human Rights Commission to plead for her release and to expose the iniquity of her treatment. Till date, Seema Azad has seen no improvement in her situation. Ajeet Bahadur hopes that his video will mobilize people all over the country to support Seema Azad, and other activists, jailed because of their fight for political and social justice.

Uttar Pradesh: Court Says No Proof to Detain Seema Azad

The Uttar Pradesh Police received a setback on Saturday when they failed to submit any evidence in court against Seema Azad, the state secretary of People’s Union for Civil Liberty (PUCL) and her husband Vishwavijay Azad.

The Special Task Force had arrested Seema and Vishwavijay on February 8 in Allahabad. They were booked under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for their alleged links with a banned Maoist organisation.

Judicial Magistrate Vikas Kumar rejected the application of the Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) seeking a week’s remand for Seema and Vishwavijay. Dismissing the application, the judged observed that the police have not come up with any concrete evidence against them. “There was no need to accept the request for police remand of the accused and the police did not mention any concrete ground for the remand,” the court observed.

Lalji Kaithwas, Seema’s advocate, argued that the ATS did not even record the statement of the accused before seeking their remand. “The police cannot seek remand without recording the statement of the accused. Remand is taken only after the police are convinced during the recording of statement that they can get evidence or make recovery in support of their claim against the accused,” he added.

Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the judge observed: “How could the ATS know that they could get some more information without recording the statement of the accused? The permission for police remand for mere interrogation of the accused cannot be granted as the police can interrogate the accused even in jail. When there is no claim of any recovery by the police, there is no need for granting police remand.”

On Monday, a local court will hear Seema and her husband’s bail application. On February 8, the STF had arrested three alleged Naxalites from Allahabad and Gorakhpur. While Seema and Vishwavijay were arrested from Allahabad, Asha alias Heerman Munda was arrested from Gorkhapur.

(Indian Express, 22nd February, 201o)

Pakistani human rights activist asks govt to reveal identities of Indian Prisoners of War


, TNN | Apr 23, 2012, 07.03PM IST

AMRITSAR: Pakistan’s former Federal Minister for Human Rights, Ansar Burney has asked Pakistan to reveal the identities of Indian Prisoners of War (PoW) who had died in its custody.

The Human Rights Activist has argued that Pakistan should make the disclosures, based on the ashes of the prisoners kept in jail. Burney said that this would make information available to relatives of the PoW, thereby ending their agonizing wait.

”Not only Pakistan but the Indian government should also provide accurate information of Pakistani PoW”, said Burney. He added that mutual exchange of crucial information could facilitate cordial equations between the two nations.

Burney, who was on the forefront of negotiations with Somalian Pirates, to secure the release of crew members aboard MV Suez, suggested that both India and Pakistan should step up maritime rescue efforts. MV Suez was hijacked by the sea bandits on August 2, 2010.

Let the world see how India and Pakistan can jointly fight to save their nationals” said Burney.

Burney, who has also been actively campaigning to save the life of Sarabhjit Singh facing death penalty in Pakistan, has sought commutation of Sarabhjit’s death sentence. “I will not let Sarabjit hang in Pakistan,” said Burney, challenging Singh’s death row. He has also sought leniency for Kirpal Singh, another convict, who has been on death row since 1992 in Pakistan.

Burney also expressed hope for Pakistani doctor Khalil Chisty of returning to Pakistan. Chisty, 80, who was sentenced to imprisonment in a jail in Ajmer for involvement in a clash that lead to the death of one person in 1992, was recently released on bail.

Hunger strike only option to get basic human rights in Prison– Arun Ferreira


Arun Ferriera who spent four years in prison shares his experinces of torture and struggle for human rights inside prison. He was speaking at the  Human Rights Education Seminar, at St Pius College, organised by the South Asian Human righst education centre. He also talks how he was not allowed to get in Constitution of India, to read

 

Free Nasrin Sotoudeh- Human Rights Defender Iran


Nasrin Sotoudeh is a lawyer, human rights campaigner and women’s rights activist.

Nasrin has defended the rights of many activists who have been arrested, tried unfairly and jailed, including Nobel Peace Laureate Shirin Ebadi. Nasrin has spoken publicly about the shortcomings of the Iranian legal system and is famous for defending young offenders on death row. Her activities made her a target, and she was arrested in September 2010.

In January 2011, Nasrin was sentenced to 11 years in prison. In mid-September 2011, the Appeals Court reduced her prison sentence to 6 years and a ban against practising law from 20 years to 10. The charges against her include “acts against national security”, “anti-regime propaganda” and belonging to the Centre for Human Rights Defenders.

For most of the past year, Nasrin Sotoudeh has been in solitary confinement in Tehran’s Evin Prison. Three hunger strikes have weakened her health. She took that drastic action to protest her imprisonment, lack of trial and her conditions of detention.

Her detention affects many others. By repressing lawyers like Nasrin and by marginalizing the Iranian Bar Association, the government denies other critics of the government the right to access competent legal representation. One of her own lawyers is currently in detention, too. Nasrin’s husband, Reza Khandan, was pressured with threats and brief imprisonment to make his wife stop her activities. He remains at risk of further harassment and faces a possible trial and imprisonment. They have two children.

Do sign the Online petition

Nasrin received the 2011 PEN/Barbara Goldsmith Freedom to Write Award. She belongs to several organizations including the One Million Signatures Campaign to Change Discriminatory Laws Against Women, and the Society for Protecting the Rights of the Child.

Amnesty International considers Nasrin Sotoudeh to be a prisoner of conscience because she is in custody only for peacefully exercising her rights to freedom of expression and association. This includes her professional work as a lawyer.

In the words of Nasrin’s husband, Reza Khandan:

“If any government can block the power of a human rights attorney, its hands are free to treat its critics and opponents in any manner it desires. Unfortunately the international community allowed the government to break this barrier.”

Nasrin Sotoudeh, as you will know, was sentenced on Sunday, 9th January 2011, to 11 years imprisonment.
Reportedly, this includes 5 years for ‘violating the Islamic dress code (Hejab)’ in a filmed acceptance speech, in which she was accepting a Human Rights Prize by the International Committee on Human Rights, in 2008. She was not permitted to leave the country, at the time, to travel to Italy to accept the award.

A further 5 years of the sentence is for ‘acting against the national security of the country’ and 1 year is for ‘propaganda against the regime’.

She has also been banned from practising law and leaving the country for 20 years. It is possible that an appeal against the sentence can be requested within 20 days.

Nasrin’s husband, Reza, was summoned to the Revolutionary Court. In a statement, he said:

“I have been asked to appear at Branch 1 of the Revolutionary Court. In the written summons, the word ‘defendant’ was used when referring to me. Of course I was also summoned once about ten to twelve days before my wife was arrested and at the time I was warned about the interviews I had given.”

The International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran says the ‘UN Human Rights Council Should Act to Address the Crisis.’ The ICHRI also says that Nasrin has ‘reportedly been tortured in prison in order to force her to confess to crimes’.

I would like to draw your attention to important legal points raised recently by renowned Human Rights Lawyer, Mehrangiz Kar, when discussing Ms Sotoudeh’s case:

“Under the concept of a fair trial, the key thing is to have access to lawyers and this is not being practiced. It is routinely being violated.
Article 168 of the Iranian constitution states:
‘All political prisoners are afforded right to a jury trial and must be public’.

When there is not a jury during the trial, that trial is not legal even under the Islamic Republic’s structure. This has been routinely violated since the 2009 elections.”

On  December 10, 2011  Nasrin Sotoudeh the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran launched the “Free Sotoudeh Project,” a campaign aimed at building international support for the release of imprisoned human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh and highlighting the tragic situation of Iranian prisoners of conscience.

Archives

Kractivism-Gonaimate Videos

Protest to Arrest

Faking Democracy- Free Irom Sharmila Now

Faking Democracy- Repression Anti- Nuke activists

JAPA- MUSICAL ACTIVISM

Kamayaninumerouno – Youtube Channel

UID-UNIQUE ?

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 6,245 other followers

Top Rated

Blog Stats

  • 1,668,877 hits

Archives

October 2017
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
%d bloggers like this: